My bowling, thinking has improved – Mishra

Amit Mishra, who has won a Test recall after four years out, reckons his bowling has improved significantly since his last Test match, against England at The Oval in 2011.”No doubt I have more experience now,” Mishra said, at the end of the second day’s play between India A and Australia A at the MA Chidambaram Stadium. “I have more experience of [assessing] how to bowl, how the partnership is going, how the wicket is, which batsman is playing how.”My bowling has improved along those lines, and my thinking has improved. I feel I have made the improvement I had needed to make.”Mishra felt Sri Lanka would be challenging, both as an opposition and in terms of the conditions India would face.”It will be a tough tour,” he said. “The Sri Lankan players, whoever is there, they are good against spin, and the pitches are good for batting.”In Sri Lanka’s last home series, Yasir Shah had picked up 24 wickets in three Tests and paved the way for Pakistan to win 2-1. India’s selectors identified this as a reason behind turning to a legspinner, but Mishra himself wasn’t looking too deeply into Yasir’s performance.”See, someone [else] performing or not performing doesn’t boost my confidence. I have always been confident about my bowling, I am bowling well and performing well, and I have confidence from that. But it is important to go there and adapt quickly to the conditions,” he said.Having played under his captaincy in ODIs, during the Asia Cup in 2014, Mishra looked forward to Virat Kohli’s leadership on the Sri Lanka tour.”He backs all the players, he talks to them, and I feel he will keep doing well in the matches to come. He has always supported me, and I’m sure he will continue supporting me when we go there. That’s his nature. He always backs his players.”Mishra is one of three spinners in India’s squad for the Test series in Sri Lanka. R Ashwin and Harbhajan Singh, the other two, were the first-choice options during India’s last Test assignment in Bangladesh. Mishra said he wasn’t worried about whether he would get a chance to play or not.”I’m in the side, so if I get the opportunity, I’ll give my best,” he said. “I’m not thinking about that. I’m happy I am making a comeback to the Indian side. I will just go there and give my best.”

Hair drops racial discrimination case against ICC

Malcolm Speed arriving at the first day of the tribunal: ‘I’m very pleased that this claim has been unconditionally withdrawn’ © Getty Images

Darrell Hair has dropped his racial discrimination case against the ICC.The surprise announcement came on the seventh day of the tribunal at the London Central Employment Tribunal. An ICC spokesman confirmed to Cricinfo that there had been no agreement made with Hair and that the decision was “unconditional”.”Darrell Hair withdraws his allegation of racial discrimination against the ICC board, members and staff,” Robert Griffiths QC, Hair’s barrister, told the media. “Mr Hair has undertaken to work with ICC management in accordance with the rehabilitation programme over the next six months.”Hair is contracted to the ICC until March 2008 but Cricinfo has learned that he then has to be given 12 months notice, so in effect he remains an employee until March 2009. He will continue to umpire international matches, but not those involving Test-playing countries. The ICC board will meet in March to discuss the results of Hair’s rehabilitation and decide whether he can return to elite umpiring, and if so, on what terms.”This is really about getting back to umpiring top cricket matches,” said Mr Hair’s solicitor, Paul Gilbert. “Darrell feels relieved and glad it’s all over, and he does feel this is in the best interests of all parties. What we have now is a future for Darrell that leads to the possibility of his return to top-level umpiring.””We are pleased the issue has been resolved,” Ray Mali, the ICC’s interim president, said. “We had no option but to defend these serious allegations.””I’m very pleased that this claim has been unconditionally withdrawn,” Malcolm Speed, the ICC’s chief executive, told the BBC. “I think in six months we’ll have a better idea [about his future as an umpire], it’s a matter for the board, which is a very diverse group generally with strong and differing groups, so a lot will depend on the rehabilitation programme and his attitude towards it.”For the next six months he will umpire matches at Associate level. I can’t speculate as to whether he will return to umpiring Full-Member matches or not”

World Cup officials insist preparations remain on course

Chris Dehring: ‘With less than six months to the start of the tournament, Cricket World Cup is very satisfied that the matter has been deliberated thoroughly’

Cricket World Cup officials have insisted that preparations for next year’s tournament remain on course, despite being forced to look at alternative venues after abandoning the Brian Lara Stadium.The stadium in southern Trinidad was set to host warm-up matches for Ireland, Pakistan, South Africa and Canada ahead of the tournament which gets underway on March 11 but the development fell several months behind. Those fixtures will now be played elsewhere, as confirmed by Chris Dehring – the World Cup managing director.”With less than six months to the start of the tournament, Cricket World Cup is very satisfied that the matter has been deliberated thoroughly, and a final decision for the good of the tournament has been taken,” Dehring said. “It certainly validates the monitoring process which is in place and shows that CWC has the situation under control.”The message to the cricketing world therefore, is that come what may, we are preparing to welcome fans from around the globe to a memorable event and, notwithstanding the odd bump or two, the Cricket World Cup train is building a powerful head of steam and is very much on track.”Donald Lockerbie, the CWC venue development director, credited the organisation’s “stringent monitoring programme” with a thorough assessment.”Earlier this year, other stadia (Sabina Park in Jamaica and Grenada National Stadium) were considerably behind in their construction schedules but, under careful monitoring, they are now on track,” he said. “Through ongoing monitoring and open communication channels there is full buy-in from all stakeholders involved with the tournament and 100 percent awareness that we must deliver a world-class event.”

Stalemate

In the past few weeks, Cricinfo has been receiving many comments and queries on the USA Council of League Presidents (CLP), and its apparent failure to capitalize on the overwhelming mandate it received from USA Cricket Association (USACA) on June 4 to carry out a top-to-bottom reform of the organization. Here is our attempt to answer the question, with what information is available to us The CLP has existed on paper for at least as long as the USACA constitution. Ironically, it owes its existence to a political battle within the USACA. The drafters of the original constitution had wanted to add a member to the board of directors to represent the unaffiliated cricket clubs who were not members of any leagues, in order to make the USACA fully representative of US cricket. This was strongly opposed by the established leagues, which instead voted that the extra seat should represent them instead.For good measure, the USACA constitution was also amended to require US leagues to have a minimum of eight member-clubs in order to qualify as a recognized league. Taken together, these changes deprived many independent cricket clubs in the USA – estimated to be between 50 to 100 – of any voice in US cricket affairs, and consolidated power in the hands of the US cricket leagues.By all accounts, the CLP did not do anything of consequence for the past decade, except vote for a representative to sit on the USACA board every two years. In their turn, the CLP representatives seem to have done very little for the US cricket leagues other than to pass through paperwork that emanated from the USACA executive.Things changed after the 2005 USACA elections when, for perhaps the first time in its history, the CLP was actually called to a meeting in Dallas. Gladstone Dainty, president of the USACA, denounced the meeting as illegal. But a substantial majority of USACA member leagues attended anyway, and voted to re-instate Veman Reddy as CLP chairman (he had secured the most votes in the USACA elections but had been disqualified on a technicality). They also passed a series of resolutions and called for an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) of the USACA in New York on June 4.The June 4 EGM was the largest-ever meeting of USACA member clubs and appeared to be a ringing endorsement for radical reform of USACA governance. But, behind the scenes, the CLP was already beginning to run into trouble. Its lawyers suggested that the specific resolutions might not hold up under court challenge, since it could not be proved that every single member club had received written notification for the EGM containing the texts of the proposed resolutions. So the resolutions were shelved, and general resolutions on reforming USACA and asking for new elections were adopted instead.The CLP also appointed a seven-member interim committee to run its affairs. In retrospect, this seems to have been a strategic mistake. The USACA’s attorneys immediately pounced on the list, and added them to the dissidents they had already been suing. They justified their action by saying that the CLP was illegally using USACA’s logo and name on its own web site — a curious argument, since CLP is a part of USACA under its constitution. The dissidents’ attorney, who now also became the CLP’s by default, advised that no further use be made of the CLP website until all legal issues were resolved. The interim council, in its own view, was dead in the water within hours of coming into existence.The CLP’s posture did not sit well with its critics, who accused it of everything from betrayal of its original mandate to knuckling under to legal broadsides. The truth, it now appears, was more complicated. First, there were differences within the interim council, which had been convened hastily and on an ad hoc basis — there were those who wanted to move ahead, and others who wanted to wait to see how the legal issues would play out.Secondly, there were some who wanted to negotiate with Dainty, and others who were adamantly opposed to such moves; the USACA took advantage of these differences, offering incentives to some while negotiating with the others.Thirdly, resentment developed between the CLP and the USACA dissidents who had spearheaded the opposition to Dainty’s USACA, but who now saw themselves being ostracized as part of the old regime who had to be excluded from any future role in USACA.And finally, whatever possibilities might have existed for independent action on the part of CLP were crushed by their own attorney, who warned of dire consequences if they did anything to give Dainty’s attorneys another excuse for legal action. The result was that the CLP ended up playing a zero-sum game with themselves, with nothing to show for their efforts.There are those who equate CLP with USACA, and claim there is little to choose between the two. This would not be an accurate comparison. The USACA, as presently run by Dainty, appears to be an autocratic organization, with decisions made at the top. The CLP, on the other hand, is ultra-democratic, with too may contending opinions and no mechanism or resolving them into action. Neither, it seems, is a good model for US cricket as they stand Each would have to undergo drastic revision before it can compete for attention in US cricket.

Warne – 'I'm proud of my efforts'

Shane Warne – the joint world-record holder© Getty Images

Shane Warne expressed his mixed feelings at the end of the drawn second Test against Sri Lanka at Cairns, after drawing level with Muttiah Muralitharan’s world record of 527 wickets. He admitted he was proud to have achieved such a feat, but added that Murali was likely to pull away from him over the course of the next few months.”It’s a pretty proud moment for my parents, who are sitting up here in the crowd. They have had a tough time over the past couple of years,” said Warne, who was banned for 12 months last year for the use of a banned diuretic, prior to the World Cup. “It would have been nice to get one or two ahead of him, and to win the Test would have been the perfect script, I suppose.”Instead, Sri Lanka dug in to reach the close of play on 183 for 8, and despite bowling 37 overs off the reel, Warne was unable to claim the record for himself. He later accepted that he may never now hold the outright title.”I’m proud of myself to equal the record,” said Warne. “The wickets I have always played on for my whole career, most of them have been to suit fast bowlers in Australia. In Sri Lanka, they obviously prepare wickets that suit him. They spin square from ball one, so he’s obviously got a lot more of a chance than I have.”Sri Lanka now host South Africa for two Tests in August, although Warne has a chance to reply on Australia’s four-Test tour of India, which starts in October. “Who knows what the future holds? The likelihood is [Murali] is probably going to get it and keep it, and that’s fine. As long as we keep winning, I’ll be pretty happy.”Warne went on record prior to the series as saying he thought Murali was “thin-skinned” to pull out of this series, and he repeated that accusation after the match. “I get heckled from my own crowds sometimes. If he’s got a problem with my opinion, he can sort it out with me if he wants to. But I’ve always got along fine with him. I think he’s done wonderful things for Sri Lanka and I’m sure he will continue to do that.”Marvan Atapattu, Sri Lanka’s captain, was pleased with the spirit that his side showed during a tough Test match. “The way we came back from when they were 370 for 2 at the end of the first day, this is not a bad result at all,” he said. “The way the team has fought during this tour, I am very happy about it.”Atapattu singled out his tailenders, Nuwan Zoysa and Chaminda Vaas, for particular praise, after they had dug in to deny Warne the record, and Australia the match. “I thought the team showed more courage than when the Aussies were in Sri Lanka [in March]. We have guys who can bat down to No. 10 so I was quite confident, although I’d be lying if I said we were relaxed. We were cheering every ball at the end.”

Elite B trounce Plate A by nine wickets

A commanding performance with bat and ball saw Elite B secure a nine-wicket win over Plate A on the third day of their four-day Duleep encounter at the MA Chidambaram Stadium, Chennai.On Thursday, Plate A skipper Hrishikesh Kanitkar did not have to wait long to rue his decision of batting first. With new-ball bowler Amit Uniyal snaring five wickets and leg-spinner Sairaj Bahatule chipping in with three wickets, Plate A were skittled out for 135 despite being 85/1 at one stage. Opener Barrington Rowland, who made 51, was the top-scorer for his team.When Elite B replied, openers Vinayak Mane and Amit Pagnis led the way with contrasting half-centuries. While Pagnis took just 80 balls to make 55, Mane adopting a more studious approach made 76 off 200 balls. Ambati Rayudu, the teenage sensation from Hyderabad was the other batting star for Elite A, making 52 off 93 balls. The contributions of the trio along with a 37 from all-rounder Romesh Pawar, helped their team make 329 in reply.Having conceded a 194-run first-innings lead, Plate A were faced with the prospect of being inflicted an innings defeat. But with Yashpal Singh scoring 93 and three other top-order batsmen chipping in with 30s, they managed to get to 244 before being all out in their second essay. Bahatule, with 4/44 from 19 overs, was the leading wicket-taker this time around.Elite B lost Mane early in their pursuit of the 51-run victory target. But Pagnis (23* off 18 balls) and Wasim Jaffer (30* off 28 balls) ensured that their side earned a win without suffering any further contretemps.

Changes to playing conditions now in effect

Significant changes to playing conditions in Tests and One-Day International have been announced by the International Cricket Council and they took effect on Saturday.Most affected are efforts to ensure continuity of play and the awarding of extras.No longer will there be debate between competing countries over the use of lights on the occasion of bad light affecting play.Lights will now be mandatory to allow play to continue in conditions when natural light would prevent it. The umpires will have the discretion to call for lights.Time added on after stoppages can now be extended beyond the day of play in Test matches, although limited to one hour a day. Where conditions allow the first 30 minutes will be added before the scheduled start of the first session with the remainder at the end of the day.All five run penalties for disciplinary breaches will be awarded on the field of play. This will be for a trial period of 12 months and will apply to Tests and ODIs.A no-ball penalty will also apply to short-pitched deliveries that prevent the batsman from being able to hit them with the bat by a normal cricket stroke. The existing two bouncers per over rule will be maintained.Leg-side wides, including deliveries going down the leg side when bowled into the rough outside leg stump, will now be called.The move reflects an ICC desire to encourage attacking bowling, particularly by spinners seeking to exploit the rough, but the ICC also believes that umpires should be able to use judgment in calling wides when appropriate.As was earlier announced one bouncer per over will now be permissible in One-Day Internationals.Bonus points for tournaments and series involving three or more teams will now be awarded to provide more meaning to contests. Winning teams will receive four points with a tie or no result being worth two points.One bonus point will be available should a team win with a run rate 1.25 times that of the opposition. The run rate will be calculated by reference to the number of runs scored, divided by the number of overs faced.Where a side is all out, the number of overs to be used is the maxium number of overs available to that side.When the Duckworth/Lewis system is employed, bonus run rates and defensive targets will be based on the revised target score and maximum overs.

Sidebottom rubber-stamps Yorkshire title credentials

Yorkshire 213 and 125 for 1 (Rhodes 53*) lead Warwickshire 69 (Sidebottom 6-34, Brooks 3-14) by 269 runs
ScorecardJack Brooks’ 3 for 14 helped tear Warwickshire apart•Getty Images

On days such as these are Yorkshire’s Championship credentials rubber-stamped. With Ryan Sidebottom turning in one of his habitually irresistible spells of swing and stamina, and threatening briefly to claim all ten wickets in the innings, Warwickshire’s batsmen were routed in the gloaming at Edgbaston.Bowled out for 69, their lowest first-class total for 29 years and their lowest at Edgbaston since 1982, they avoided the follow-on by the skin of their tenth wicket – no mean feat when you have already reduced your opponents to 213 in their first innings – then watched Yorkshire’s batsmen plough off into the distance in a less dramatically one-sided evening session.By the close of a day in which Edgbaston’s bespoke “e”-shaped floodlights had been a near-constant companion, Will Rhodes had calmly notched up his maiden Championship half-century with Jack Leaning alongside him on 28. At 125 for 1, the lead was already an imposing 259 with nine wickets standing, and with two days remaining, there is plenty time for Yorkshire to turn the screw further, even with a dour forecast in prospect.Yorkshire’s day began with a sniff of an opening, courtesy of Sidebottom’s two-wicket burst on Sunday night, but plenty of work still required to restore parity after a slipshod display with the bat in which Jonny Bairstow’s century had shown up the shortcomings of the rest of the order.After a rain-wrecked morning session had been reduced to nine balls, the mere fact that play was possible after lunch came as something of a surprise. Either way, Warwickshire’s batsmen did not appear remotely ready to repel the threat posed by the oldest swinger in town.”Taking a few early wickets last night helped the confidence,” said Sidebottom. “I suppose it happens like that, you get in a bit of rhythm, you put it in the right area with a little bit of seam and swing, you get the edge, got a few bowleds, it was really nice.”In the team meeting this morning, Dizzy [Jason Gillespie] actually put in onto me to say a few words and I said we’ve got to bowl full and straight, so I had to do what I’d said!”Sidebottom required nine deliveries in the afternoon session to send shockwaves through Warwickshire’s innings. Having been standing at the far end on Sunday evening when Varun Chopra shouldered arms to Sidebottom’s first ball of the innings, Ian Westwood might have realised the folly of leaving the good-length deliveries. Instead he too had his stumps flattened by a wicked late curler, and at 29 for 3, Warwickshire’s innings swung out of control.Laurie Evans needed ten balls to get off the mark and was then cut down by his 11th, another Sidebottom special that curled around his half-formed defences to flatten his off stump, as Warwickshire contrived to lose their next five wickets for no runs in the space of 30 balls.Sam Hain bagged a nine-ball duck as he handed Sidebottom his fifth wicket of the innings, courtesy of a smart take by Jack Leaning at third slip, whereupon, two balls later, Peter McKay was pinned so palpably lbw that Sidebottom didn’t bother turning to the umpire to appeal as he charged off in celebration. At that stage, Sidebottom had claimed all six wickets in the innings but before he could start a new over, Warwickshire lost their seventh, and their third in four balls, when Jonathan Trott, their only remaining hope, was outstandingly plucked by Leaning, scooped at full stretch in the slips to give Jack Brooks his first scalp of the day.Jeetan Patel registered the fifth duck of the innings when he fenced limply outside off to be caught behind in Brooks’ next over, and Boyd Rankin the sixth, though not before he had raised ironic cheers in the crowd for scoring Warwickshire’s first run in six-and-a-half overs, a deflection off the helmet that required a break for some running repairs.At 37 for 9, the ludicrous prospect of the follow-on now loomed into view – Yorkshire’s bowlers could hardly have been fresher, with Sidebottom and Brooks running on adrenaline and the change seamers, Tim Bresnan and Steve Patterson, yet to be called upon, and Andrew Gale signalled Yorkshire’s desire to stick their opponents back in with one of the more improbable 37-for-9 fields you’ll ever witness – two slips and four men out on the boundary.But Rikki Clarke found the gumption to resist. He flicked Sidebottom over square leg for six and added three more fours en route to 28 from 42 balls which, at that stage, was the joint-second-highest score of the match. His resistance was ended when Patterson bowled him through the gate, leaving Oliver Hannon-Dalby unbeaten on 5.Yorkshire’s second innings was a model of uncomplicated restraint. The conditions remained trying but the fizz was understandably absent from their attack. Rhodes capitalised with 53 not out from 125 balls, an innings of understated class that showed why, at 20 years old, he is a batsman whose progress is being so closely monitored.With Leaning no less resolute, the only man to fall was Alex Lees, who was smartly taken at first slip by Chopra to end an opening stand of 58. But Warwickshire’s problems were compounded soon afterwards when McKay, the wicketkeeper who had been conspicuous by his failure to go for that catch, had to leave the field with a suspected broken finger. His role was temporarily filled by Andy Umeed, a 19-year-old batsman whose maiden first-class match came for Scotland against Afghanistan at Stirling last month.

Butt takes Lahore Whites into semi-final

Salman Butt continued to shake off a wretched Quaid-e-Azam trophy campaign. His second unbeaten half-century in three games helped Lahore Whites trounce Peshawar by 27 runs. Butt’s 58-ball 85 took his side to the top of the standings.His fellow opener Kamran Akmal also joined in to make a 40-ball 52 as the Whites notched up 163. In response, the struggling Peshawar – who now have one win in six matches – could not find a single batsman to score over 25. That meant the chase never really took off. Lahore’s bowlers picked them off at ease with Umaid Asif starring with four for 26 to break the back of the Peshawar chase. Ehsan Adil and Asif Ali took two wickets apiece as Peshawar were cleaned up for 136, with their chances of qualifying for the semi-finals officially extinguished.A century stand between Umar Amin and Zain Abbas wasn’t enough for Rawalpindi as they lost to Faisalabad, thereby falling out of contention for the last four. Amin and Abbas scored 67 and 62 respectively, with Sohail Tanvir adding a quickfire 32 off 16 as Rawalpindi surged to 193. It was, surprisingly, the international stars in Faisalabad’s bowling attack who were the most expensive, with Faheem Ashraf, Saeed Ajmal and Yasir Shah conceding a whopping 115 runs in their combined 11 overs.But Faisalabad gave the daunting chase a right go, thanks largely to a 43-ball 87 from Sohaib Maqsood, even as the top order fell cheaply around him. By the time he was dismissed, he had contributed 87 to Faisalabad’s score of 108, but 86 were still required off a mere seven overss, the balance firmly in favour of the hosts. But sensational hitting from Khurram Manzoor – who finished with an unbeaten 52 off 25 – and Ashraf helped Faisalabad sneak home with a ball to spare and strengthen their hold on a semi-final position.

South Africa A capitulate against Indian spinners

Ishant Sharma ‘s early blows triggered the South African collapse in the first innings © AFP

Scorecard
Weighed down by a mountain of runs, South Africa A crumbled against two spinners of different varieties and a lively young seamer to give India A an innings victory at the Feroz Shah Kotla. A rejuvenated Ishant Sharma got the breakthroughs early in the day but it was left-arm spinner Pragyan Ojha, with eight wickets, and legspinner Amit Mishra who stifled the tourists and forced the win inside three days.Sharma, who overstepped a fair deal on day two, was far better in his six-over spell this morning. Having sorted out his no-ball issues, Sharma struck a good line and got into fast-bowling rhythm. Crucially, he was able to extract reverse-swing from a fairly dormant surface. Morne van Wyk, whose 67 was the highest contribution by some distance, was suckered into a tame drive outside the off stump and was well caught at first slip. The ball flew high to Mohammad Kaif, who had little time to react but dived to his right and intercepted as it veered towards second slip.Sharma then removed Ashwell Prince with one that was fuller and shaped away after pitching. Prince initially came forward but then stood his ground, pushing ever so slightly and nicking into Parthiv Patel’s hands. Sharma’s discipline on the day paid off and India were right into it.134 for 4 became 145 for 9 as South Africa collapsed against the spinners. Mishra only bowled two overs on the second day but in the four he got in the morning, he was spot on. Boeta Dippenaar missed a googly and was taken off the inside-edge by Cheteshwar Pujara at short leg. Pujara failed to hold onto a tougher chance as Thami Tsolekile swept hard two balls later, but Mishra had his man just after. He tossed it up a touch more, held it back in the air just a second, and Tsolekile was beaten only to push it to Aakash Chopra at silly point. In between two strikes from Ojha, Mishra dived full stretch to his right to pluck an on-drive from Rory Kleinveldt. Three wickets for eight runs.Ojha defeated Justin Ontong in the flight as well to hold onto a return catch and bowled last-man Friedel de Wet as he slogged across the line.The follow-on was enforced and South Africa were in a similar predicament. Pankaj Singh had Werner Coetsee leg before for just six, though the ball may have pitched outside the line of off. Five minutes before lunch Ojha got van Wyk with one that spun away, the batsman playing forward then trying to withdraw only to for Patel to pick up a smart catch.From 28 for 2 at the interval, there were a few further dents in the South African innings before it was stabilized by Prince. It was Ojha again, bowling Hashim Amla with one that stayed low and came on faster, and using the flight to lure Boeta Dippenaar into chipping to cover. Ashraf Makda dropped a sitter at mid-off from Alviro Peterson, with the score 45 for 3, but it only cost one run. Peterson played down the wrong line to Sharma and was adjudged leg before for 6. Pankaj Singh then came back and on the stroke of tea removed Prince, fishing at a wide one off the back foot and finding Kaif at second slip.Ontong and Tsolekile pushed back the inevitable with a 66-run seventh-wicket stand but Ontong (35 from 88 balls) edged an attempted lofted on-drive to Kaif at second slip to give Ojha his fourth wicket. The fifth came as Kleinvedlt cut into Kaif’s hands at slip but Tsolelike raced to a half-century with a flurry of fours and sixes. With less than two stipulated overs to play, de Wet heaved Mishra to midwicket and South Africa fell to 198 for 9. The umpires consulted and agreed to extend play and Mishra needed just two deliveries to wrap up a comprehensive victory.Where three of India’s batsmen managed centuries – two of them doubles – there were but two half-centuries from South Africa. The teams now head to scenic Dharamshala for the last of the four-day fixtures before the one-dayers start. India will look to wrap up the series, while the visitors would hope the change in altitude brings some much-needed oomph.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus