Warne – England must respect county cricket

Shane Warne: ‘The county game needs more respect’ © Getty Images

Shane Warne believes that England need to show more respect to county cricket, but feels that the new coach, Peter Moores, is taking the country in the right direction.”Under Duncan Fletcher England didn’t pay enough respect to county cricket and I hope that changes under Peter Moores,” Warne, the Hampshire captain, told the London-based Sport magazine. “I think this last season with Hampshire has been the strongest one I’ve ever seen for county cricket and it’s seen young bowlers like Chris Tremlett, Stuart Broad and Jimmy Anderson come through to the national team.”Fletcher’s approach as England coach wasn’t overly sympathetic to releasing centrally-contracted players for their counties. His successor, Moores – a big advocate of the county system which nurtured him – has been more sympathetic. He has also revived the international careers of players who had impressed for their county such as Graeme Swann and Ryan Sidebottom, both of Nottinghamshire.It’s generally agreed that the county game is improving, particularly since the introduction of two tiers for the Championship. At last, the talent appears to be concentrating into the top of the first division, which the system was designed for.Warne also had strong views on the decision to cut the number of overseas players allowed from two to one per county from next year. “I also think it’s important to have two overseas players per county,” he said. “It helps these young guys to play against the best and they definitely improve for it.”It’s not just the English players who have benefitted from playing against the overseas players. Several Australian players who had county stints this summer have made a thumping start to their domestic season.Cameron White, who played at Somerset, has continued his excellent batting form for Victoria. His team-mate David Hussey has eased from a successful season at Nottinghamshire straight into the runs for Victoria, via a useful Australia A tour in Pakistan.White also praised county cricket recently – especially the effect it has had on Hussey. “I’ve no doubt county cricket has definitely helped his game,” he said. “Over the last four winters he’s been [playing county cricket] he’s probably facing a couple of thousand balls out in the middle while everyone else who’s not playing cricket is hitting indoor bowling machine balls. There’s no doubt I think that makes you a better player over there, batting all that time.”Doug Bollinger and Phil Jaques may not have had the best of times at Worcestershire but, following the A tour, they are back on the money for New South Wales.

Ponting named ICC Player of the Year

‘The challenge for us now is to try to win the ICC Champions Trophy final on Sunday and then head back to Australia and try to win the Ashes back’ © Getty Images

Ricky Ponting, the Australia captain and batsman has been named ICC Player of the Year at the ICC Awards in Mumbai. It capped a prolific evening for Ponting who was also earlier named Test Player of the Year and was included in both the ODI and Test Teams of the Year.”It has been a satisfying year personally and also for the rest of the team,” Ponting said. “For me to be a part of that success has been great for me. To see Mike [Hussey] win an award and so many other Australians to be nominated indicates that the team is doing well at the moment. It’s a great night for Australian cricket.”To captain Australia is something I love and never take for granted. We had to show a lot of character immediately after [losing] the Ashes,” Ponting admitted. “And since then we have managed to do that. We have set a new standard for ourselves, we’ve worked hard and thankfully it’s paying off for us at the moment… I think we learned a lot from that Ashes series and we are a better team for that so I think we will be a very difficult side to beat this summer.”The challenge for us now is to try to win the ICC Champions Trophy final on Sunday and then head back to Australia and try to win the Ashes back. It’s going to be a busy time but we are really looking forward to it.”During the voting period of August 1 2005 to August 8 2006, Ponting played 16 Tests and 20 one-dayers. In Tests he scored a phenomenal 1,791 runs at an average of 68.88, including two centuries in his 100th Test match, against South Africa in Durban.”It’s a great thrill, even to be nominated on the short-list but to walk away with two awards is something out of this world, something very special,” he said. “It’s the sort of thing that is very satisfying when you look back on your career in years to come. I’ll be able to spend more time enjoying it then.””On behalf of the ICC I would like to pass on my congratulations to Ricky for winning this award,” Percy Sonn, the ICC president said. “He has shown over the last year that he is the best and it is great that we have this opportunity to recognise that. He is a credit to his team and his country and through his talent and hard work, he is a role model for all aspiring cricketers and sportspeople of all descriptions.”Ponting beat off competition from his team-mate Michael Hussey, and Mohammad Yousuf (Pakistan) and Muttiah Muralitharan (Sri Lanka). Last year, the award was shared by Andrew Flintoff and Jacques Kallis while in 2004 the award went to Rahul Dravid.

Japan squeeze out Cook Islands

Japan claimed their first ICC cricket title with a six-run victory over the Cook Islands in the final of the East Asia-Pacific (EAP) Cricket Cup tournament in Vanuatu.Japan, sent into bat, scored 161 off 48 overs with opening batsmen Tetsuro Chino top scoring with 51 off 120 balls and Cooks’ wicketkeeper Ioane Tangimetua claiming five catches. The Cook Islands fell just short, dismissed for 155 with Tuakana Marukore top scoring with 55 and Chris Brown chipping in with 45. Japan’s paceman Patrick Giles-Jones finished with 3 for 31 off 10 overs.Japan and the Cook Islands, by finishing first and second, qualified for the EAP Cricket Trophy to be played in mid-2006 to claim a place in the World Cricket League in early 2007.Final placings 1 Japan, 2 Cook Islands, 3 Vanuatu, 4 Tonga, 5 Indonesia, 6 Samoa.

Confusion surrounds Robinson 'sacking'

The circumstances behind the recent sacking of long-standing umpire Ian Robinson by the Zimbabwe Cricket Union are not as straightforward as at first seemed to be the case.Last week, it appeared that Robinson had been sacked by the ZCU, but his version of events is disputed by a source within the board.The source told Wisden Cricinfo that the ZCU planned to move Robinson from international tours manager, his present role, to the post of umpires manager, responsible for umpiring and scoring throughout the country and organising training courses. But, it is claimed, there was not an issue with him continuing as an umpire. The source said that when Robinson’s name was submitted to the ICC, it rejected his nomination, and so the ZCU put forward Duncan Frost instead.At this point, it is alleged that Robinson took umbrage and resigned, adding that he would not stand in domestic matches.

Nasser Hussain – Wisden Cricketer of the Year

Nasser Hussain has always been too intense to inspire mass affection. Like Nick Faldo, or Steve Redgrave, or other English sportsmen suspected of being obsessive, he has inspired respect instead. In his four years as England’s captain, Hussain should have inspired gratitude too. Last winter, in the first three Ashes Tests, England were a rowing-boat overwhelmed by the mountainous waves of Australian cricket. Almost every touring side had capsized against Steve Waugh’s team in Australia; but Hussain, a beleaguered skipper if ever there was, kept England afloat. If one image could sum up the tour, it came in the one-day matches before Christmas when England – 3-0 down in the Test series – had to play four one-day internationals in eight days at venues as widespread as Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth. Any other England captain might have let his exhaustion, physical or mental, show. But there was Hussain in the field, hectoring, urging, berating, then exploding in celebration at the fall of each wicket. England have not had such an ardent captain since Douglas Jardine, another cricketer whose obsessiveness was not to English taste. Spurred on by this zeal, and blessed when injuries at last struck Australia instead, England won the Fifth Test in Sydney.It has not been zeal alone which has fuelled the England team since 1999, but a sharp intellect blended with a diplomat’s skill. Hussain has helped to educate the cricket public, and media, as Mark Taylor did in Australia a few years earlier. With his honest insights into the state of English cricket (and occasional propaganda), Hussain has raised the level of debate above the platitudes which used to prevail. Using a mind that won a Maths scholarship to Forest School and achieved a 2.2 in Geology and Chemistry at Durham University when cricket allowed, Hussain also advanced the moral argument for England not to play in Zimbabwe: it was believed to be the first time in England that team sportsmen at national level, and certainly the whole cricket team, had exercised their consciences. Above all, Hussain’s legacy is that he has raised standards inside and outside the England team.NASSER HUSSAIN was born on March 28, 1968 in Madras (now Chennai). His father Javaid, or Joe, represented Madras in the Ranji Trophy before emigrating to England, where he married an Englishwoman, Shireen. He then returned to India to set up an electronic-components factory in Madras, where the youngest of his three sons was born. Nasser’s first experiences of cricket were family visits to Chepauk, where his father was a member of the Madras Cricket Club. His elder brothers Mel and Abbas used to bat on the outfield while he chased after the ball. When Joe returned with his family to England, and took charge of the indoor cricket school in Ilford, Nasser used to bowl for hours on end at his elder brothers, and not just because he was the youngest: he found leg-spin interesting. He was keener on football at first – supporting Leeds United, as he still does, and playing for school teams – but Sunday mornings were always dedicated to cricket, and his father kept pushing him in this direction. At eight, he was bowling leg-breaks for Essex Schools Under-11s, and at 12 for their Under-15s.Born five days apart, Hussain and Mike Atherton soon found their careers progressing in parallel as they captained, batted and bowled legspin for England age-group teams, while also passing enough exams to go to a leading university. In his mid-teens, however, Hussain "grew a foot in a winter" and the trajectory of his bowling was altered: "I went from bowling out Graham Gooch in the indoor school with everyone watching to hitting the roof or bowling triple-bouncers in deadly silence."His father remembers him crying in bed at the loss of his legbreak; the son felt he was letting his father down. He was also anxious not to be left behind by his peers, boys like Atherton, Trevor Ward, Martin Bicknell and Chris Lewis. So he made himself into a batsman, moving up the order from tail-end to opening or No. 3, and becoming the first boy at Forest to score 1000 runs in a season since 1901. Vestiges of this manufacturing process remain in his technique: he bats with little left elbow and plenty of bottom hand, and backs up with the bat in his right hand (not that Duncan Fletcher minds). In general, his runs seem to be scored as much by an exceptional effort of will as through natural talent. These characteristics have been most apparent in one-day cricket, or when Michael Vaughan at the other end has been stroking the ball around with classical orthodoxy.He also developed a reputation. The fieriest of three brothers who had all inherited their father’s short temper, he vented his frustration at being dismissed – and at being unable to bowl leg-spin? – on his equipment or anything else in sight. He came to be bracketed with Graham Thorpe and Mark Ramprakash as a brat-pack. By the time he became captain, Hussain was as unpopular as any cricketer in England. The perception, though, was worse than the reality. Self-obsessed as he may have been, driven to succeed as many migrants are, and seldom the one to depart after a run-out, he confined his tantrums to the dressing-room (including altercations with his Essex team-mates Neil Foster and Mark Ilott). He describes himself as "a fairly shy sort of bloke". According to his father, he inherited "good sense" from his mother, together with a sturdy sense of right and wrong.The frustrations built up through his early twenties. Taken under the wing of Gooch, his Essex and England captain, who urged him to play straighter and less behind point with an open face, Hussain made his Test debut on the 1989-90 tour of the West Indies but was mostly out of the side thereafter. His Essex record was good without being outstanding. He spent the 1994-95 winter playing in South Africa, where he was prescribed a contact lens (he has since had laser treatment on his left eye). The England A-team captaincy in Pakistan the following winter was a lifeline: it took him out of himself, encouraged him to think he might be fulfilled, and proved that he was not as bad or moody as his reputation suggested. When he was recalled to the Test team at the start of the 1996 season in the problem position of No. 3, he survived a big appeal off Javagal Srinath, and went on to his maiden Test hundred. A year later, he made 207 as England for once went ahead in a modern Ashes series. Only injury has kept him out of the team since.When Atherton resigned as England captain in 1998, Hussain had to wait while Alec Stewart had his turn. But when Stewart was sacked after the 1999 World Cup, he was matured and ready for the responsibility. His first Test in charge ended in victory as England dismantled a modest New Zealand side; his first series in failure when Hussain broke a finger in the Second Test and England fell apart. But help was on its way with Duncan Fletcher joining as coach for that winter’s tour of South Africa. They had not met before but it was a fine partnership from the first. Hussain generated heat, Fletcher light.Fletcher planned and prepared the players – identifying those with the right character and refining their technique, especially when batting against spin – while Hussain led them zealously on the field. Once a new system of squad players contracted to the ECB was put in place, English cricket was set for its finest achievements – four successive Test series won – since the Ian Botham era ended in the mid-1980s.But for Hussain himself, 2000 was also an annus horribilis. He did not make a first-class fifty until his final match, the Karachi Test. His place in the side was never questioned as his players and the media appreciated his captaincy, but he still couldn’t make a run. Looking back, Hussain can see that he gave too little attention to his own game, that he took his own form for granted after a hugely productive tour of South Africa. It didn’t matter if he didn’t make runs against Zimbabwe, while against West Indies he became consumed by the prospect of England beating them in a series for the first time since 1969. By the Oval Test, completely out of form, he went out to bat in the second innings unaware that he was on a pair, and duly bagged one. Once he learned to compartmentalise, he worked out that 60% of his attention had to go on the team, 40% on his own game. And the effect on his own game may be judged by the fact that he has been England’s one consistent batsman in their last five Test series. Every time, his first innings of the series has yielded at least a half-century: the captain stamping his mark.England’s series victories in 2000-01, by 1-0 in Pakistan and 2-1 in Sri Lanka, were the apogee of Hussain’s captaincy – and of a generation of England cricketers, including Atherton, Stewart, Thorpe, Darren Gough and Andy Caddick. In Pakistan, England held on doggedly until the pressure told on the home team, who had never lost at Karachi before. In Sri Lanka, England overcame the stifling heat and the stifling spin of Muttiah Muralitharan. If one session marked the climax, it was when England dismissed Sri Lanka in the Third Test in Colombo in only 28.1 overs. Hussain went into the match injured and could barely walk by the end of it, but his zeal – his passion – won the day.The hope was that England could go on to win the Ashes series of 2001. Instead, they went from apogee to nadir with a 4-1 defeat. England began a run of injuries which lasted into the following Ashes series and raised numerous questions about their medical team. Hussain himself broke a finger in the First Test against Australia at Edgbaston and missed the next two. If any good came of it, it was the plastic coating which he adopted as extra protection on his gloves. Since then, he has not missed a Test.A mark of his captaincy has been his refusal to accept mediocrity, however often his batsmen have failed to follow his example and given their wickets away, however inaccurate his seamers have been, however little his spinners have turned the ball. Atherton in the end became resigned to his bowlers’ and fielders’ fallibility; Hussain has barked at every foible and thought up new ways to dismiss batsmen. His imaginative use of 8-1 fields paid off in India when the home batsmen, after their First Test win, were content to be tied down; and again at times last summer when Sri Lanka were beaten 2-0, the one win to set against three recent losses and three drawn series; but in Australia the batsmen refused to be tied down and it was widely reckoned that Hussain asked his bowlers to experiment too much. He thought his seamers had matured to the extent that he could send Australia in at Brisbane and give his bowlers best use of the pitch; he admitted his mistake long before the match ended in massive defeat. By the Third Test in Perth he was considering his position, not for the first or last time, but in the darkest hour he pushed himself as hard as ever. While England were lucky that Glenn McGrath and Shane Warne were both injured, they still had to be in good enough shape to take advantage. After the Sydney Test, Hussain received "a really nice e-mail" from Gough, which meant a lot as an expression of esteem from his peers.After the World Cup he retired as England’s one-day captain, sensibly deciding to concentrate on Test cricket. By then his wish to be remembered as "a decent leader of men" had already been fulfilled. The only dispute is whether he has been the equal of Mike Brearley as the best England captain since World Series Cricket; or, as their fellow-captain David Gower believes, even better, in more troubled times. To have been captain of England for four years, the most stressful job in cricket, is an achievement in itself. To leave the team better off than when he started, doubly so.Scyld Berry is cricket correspondent of the Sunday Telegraph.

India's absence unfortunate, say captains

After all the uncertainty surrounding the Asian Test Championship, thetournament is finally ready to kick off from Wednesday though India’sabsence has taken the gloss off the tournament.”The championship has lost its colour,” said Bangladesh captain NaimurRahman on the eve of his team’s only fourth Test match since gainingTest status.It could have been nice to play one more game (against India). Wecould have learnt a lot after playing against them,” Naimur said afterhis team had a two-hour net session Tuesday.Pakistan captain Waqar Younis was also disappointed at India’swithdrawal from the now reduced three-team competition which alsofeatures Sri Lanka.”The championship has lost it’s charm after India pulled its team, butwe hope to get maximum points from this match,” he said.India’s mind-boggling decision will certainly leave the ACC to sufferwith huge financial losses. But the decision to go-ahead with thetournament despite India’s withdrawal shows who calls the shots.But will the International Cricket Council (ICC) show some teeth andimpose sanctions on India is yet to be seen though analysts believeIndia will once again escape scot-free because of its massivecommercial market on which electronic media survives. But the questionis how long will India’s unsporting behaviour be tolerated.

My bowling, thinking has improved – Mishra

Amit Mishra, who has won a Test recall after four years out, reckons his bowling has improved significantly since his last Test match, against England at The Oval in 2011.”No doubt I have more experience now,” Mishra said, at the end of the second day’s play between India A and Australia A at the MA Chidambaram Stadium. “I have more experience of [assessing] how to bowl, how the partnership is going, how the wicket is, which batsman is playing how.”My bowling has improved along those lines, and my thinking has improved. I feel I have made the improvement I had needed to make.”Mishra felt Sri Lanka would be challenging, both as an opposition and in terms of the conditions India would face.”It will be a tough tour,” he said. “The Sri Lankan players, whoever is there, they are good against spin, and the pitches are good for batting.”In Sri Lanka’s last home series, Yasir Shah had picked up 24 wickets in three Tests and paved the way for Pakistan to win 2-1. India’s selectors identified this as a reason behind turning to a legspinner, but Mishra himself wasn’t looking too deeply into Yasir’s performance.”See, someone [else] performing or not performing doesn’t boost my confidence. I have always been confident about my bowling, I am bowling well and performing well, and I have confidence from that. But it is important to go there and adapt quickly to the conditions,” he said.Having played under his captaincy in ODIs, during the Asia Cup in 2014, Mishra looked forward to Virat Kohli’s leadership on the Sri Lanka tour.”He backs all the players, he talks to them, and I feel he will keep doing well in the matches to come. He has always supported me, and I’m sure he will continue supporting me when we go there. That’s his nature. He always backs his players.”Mishra is one of three spinners in India’s squad for the Test series in Sri Lanka. R Ashwin and Harbhajan Singh, the other two, were the first-choice options during India’s last Test assignment in Bangladesh. Mishra said he wasn’t worried about whether he would get a chance to play or not.”I’m in the side, so if I get the opportunity, I’ll give my best,” he said. “I’m not thinking about that. I’m happy I am making a comeback to the Indian side. I will just go there and give my best.”

Hair drops racial discrimination case against ICC

Malcolm Speed arriving at the first day of the tribunal: ‘I’m very pleased that this claim has been unconditionally withdrawn’ © Getty Images

Darrell Hair has dropped his racial discrimination case against the ICC.The surprise announcement came on the seventh day of the tribunal at the London Central Employment Tribunal. An ICC spokesman confirmed to Cricinfo that there had been no agreement made with Hair and that the decision was “unconditional”.”Darrell Hair withdraws his allegation of racial discrimination against the ICC board, members and staff,” Robert Griffiths QC, Hair’s barrister, told the media. “Mr Hair has undertaken to work with ICC management in accordance with the rehabilitation programme over the next six months.”Hair is contracted to the ICC until March 2008 but Cricinfo has learned that he then has to be given 12 months notice, so in effect he remains an employee until March 2009. He will continue to umpire international matches, but not those involving Test-playing countries. The ICC board will meet in March to discuss the results of Hair’s rehabilitation and decide whether he can return to elite umpiring, and if so, on what terms.”This is really about getting back to umpiring top cricket matches,” said Mr Hair’s solicitor, Paul Gilbert. “Darrell feels relieved and glad it’s all over, and he does feel this is in the best interests of all parties. What we have now is a future for Darrell that leads to the possibility of his return to top-level umpiring.””We are pleased the issue has been resolved,” Ray Mali, the ICC’s interim president, said. “We had no option but to defend these serious allegations.””I’m very pleased that this claim has been unconditionally withdrawn,” Malcolm Speed, the ICC’s chief executive, told the BBC. “I think in six months we’ll have a better idea [about his future as an umpire], it’s a matter for the board, which is a very diverse group generally with strong and differing groups, so a lot will depend on the rehabilitation programme and his attitude towards it.”For the next six months he will umpire matches at Associate level. I can’t speculate as to whether he will return to umpiring Full-Member matches or not”

World Cup officials insist preparations remain on course

Chris Dehring: ‘With less than six months to the start of the tournament, Cricket World Cup is very satisfied that the matter has been deliberated thoroughly’

Cricket World Cup officials have insisted that preparations for next year’s tournament remain on course, despite being forced to look at alternative venues after abandoning the Brian Lara Stadium.The stadium in southern Trinidad was set to host warm-up matches for Ireland, Pakistan, South Africa and Canada ahead of the tournament which gets underway on March 11 but the development fell several months behind. Those fixtures will now be played elsewhere, as confirmed by Chris Dehring – the World Cup managing director.”With less than six months to the start of the tournament, Cricket World Cup is very satisfied that the matter has been deliberated thoroughly, and a final decision for the good of the tournament has been taken,” Dehring said. “It certainly validates the monitoring process which is in place and shows that CWC has the situation under control.”The message to the cricketing world therefore, is that come what may, we are preparing to welcome fans from around the globe to a memorable event and, notwithstanding the odd bump or two, the Cricket World Cup train is building a powerful head of steam and is very much on track.”Donald Lockerbie, the CWC venue development director, credited the organisation’s “stringent monitoring programme” with a thorough assessment.”Earlier this year, other stadia (Sabina Park in Jamaica and Grenada National Stadium) were considerably behind in their construction schedules but, under careful monitoring, they are now on track,” he said. “Through ongoing monitoring and open communication channels there is full buy-in from all stakeholders involved with the tournament and 100 percent awareness that we must deliver a world-class event.”

Stalemate

In the past few weeks, Cricinfo has been receiving many comments and queries on the USA Council of League Presidents (CLP), and its apparent failure to capitalize on the overwhelming mandate it received from USA Cricket Association (USACA) on June 4 to carry out a top-to-bottom reform of the organization. Here is our attempt to answer the question, with what information is available to us The CLP has existed on paper for at least as long as the USACA constitution. Ironically, it owes its existence to a political battle within the USACA. The drafters of the original constitution had wanted to add a member to the board of directors to represent the unaffiliated cricket clubs who were not members of any leagues, in order to make the USACA fully representative of US cricket. This was strongly opposed by the established leagues, which instead voted that the extra seat should represent them instead.For good measure, the USACA constitution was also amended to require US leagues to have a minimum of eight member-clubs in order to qualify as a recognized league. Taken together, these changes deprived many independent cricket clubs in the USA – estimated to be between 50 to 100 – of any voice in US cricket affairs, and consolidated power in the hands of the US cricket leagues.By all accounts, the CLP did not do anything of consequence for the past decade, except vote for a representative to sit on the USACA board every two years. In their turn, the CLP representatives seem to have done very little for the US cricket leagues other than to pass through paperwork that emanated from the USACA executive.Things changed after the 2005 USACA elections when, for perhaps the first time in its history, the CLP was actually called to a meeting in Dallas. Gladstone Dainty, president of the USACA, denounced the meeting as illegal. But a substantial majority of USACA member leagues attended anyway, and voted to re-instate Veman Reddy as CLP chairman (he had secured the most votes in the USACA elections but had been disqualified on a technicality). They also passed a series of resolutions and called for an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) of the USACA in New York on June 4.The June 4 EGM was the largest-ever meeting of USACA member clubs and appeared to be a ringing endorsement for radical reform of USACA governance. But, behind the scenes, the CLP was already beginning to run into trouble. Its lawyers suggested that the specific resolutions might not hold up under court challenge, since it could not be proved that every single member club had received written notification for the EGM containing the texts of the proposed resolutions. So the resolutions were shelved, and general resolutions on reforming USACA and asking for new elections were adopted instead.The CLP also appointed a seven-member interim committee to run its affairs. In retrospect, this seems to have been a strategic mistake. The USACA’s attorneys immediately pounced on the list, and added them to the dissidents they had already been suing. They justified their action by saying that the CLP was illegally using USACA’s logo and name on its own web site — a curious argument, since CLP is a part of USACA under its constitution. The dissidents’ attorney, who now also became the CLP’s by default, advised that no further use be made of the CLP website until all legal issues were resolved. The interim council, in its own view, was dead in the water within hours of coming into existence.The CLP’s posture did not sit well with its critics, who accused it of everything from betrayal of its original mandate to knuckling under to legal broadsides. The truth, it now appears, was more complicated. First, there were differences within the interim council, which had been convened hastily and on an ad hoc basis — there were those who wanted to move ahead, and others who wanted to wait to see how the legal issues would play out.Secondly, there were some who wanted to negotiate with Dainty, and others who were adamantly opposed to such moves; the USACA took advantage of these differences, offering incentives to some while negotiating with the others.Thirdly, resentment developed between the CLP and the USACA dissidents who had spearheaded the opposition to Dainty’s USACA, but who now saw themselves being ostracized as part of the old regime who had to be excluded from any future role in USACA.And finally, whatever possibilities might have existed for independent action on the part of CLP were crushed by their own attorney, who warned of dire consequences if they did anything to give Dainty’s attorneys another excuse for legal action. The result was that the CLP ended up playing a zero-sum game with themselves, with nothing to show for their efforts.There are those who equate CLP with USACA, and claim there is little to choose between the two. This would not be an accurate comparison. The USACA, as presently run by Dainty, appears to be an autocratic organization, with decisions made at the top. The CLP, on the other hand, is ultra-democratic, with too may contending opinions and no mechanism or resolving them into action. Neither, it seems, is a good model for US cricket as they stand Each would have to undergo drastic revision before it can compete for attention in US cricket.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus